The four-page doc, filed by legal professional Eric Nelson, particulars quite a few errors the protection believes have been made through the trial which violated Chauvin’s constitutional rights to a due course of and a good trial.
These embody allegations of errors made by Hennepin Decide Peter Cahill, prosecutorial misconduct, juror misconduct, witness intimidation and the affect of publicity.
No particular incident or juror have been famous within the movement.
In a press release to CNN, John Stiles, deputy chief of employees for Minnesota Lawyer Common Keith Ellison, stated, “The court docket has already rejected many of those arguments and the State will vigorously oppose them.”
The brand new court docket submitting alleges the publicity through the trial threatened its equity, and a protection knowledgeable witness was intimidated after he testified, however earlier than the jury deliberated.
“The publicity right here was so pervasive and so prejudicial earlier than and through this trial that it amounted to a structural defect within the proceedings,” Nelson wrote.
Nelson accused the jury of committing misconduct and will have “felt threatened or intimidated, felt race-based strain through the proceedings, and/or failed to stick to directions throughout deliberations,” the movement learn.
The Court docket “abused its discretion” in not granting a change of venue or sequestering the jury, the court docket submitting says.
The court docket additionally “abused its discretion when it submitted directions to the jury that did not precisely mirror the regulation” in reference to the second-degree unintentional homicide, third-degree homicide and licensed use of drive, the doc learn.
Nelson additionally wrote the prosecutors dedicated misconduct “together with however not restricted to: disparaging the Protection; improper vouching; and failing to adequately put together its witnesses.”